anjaeilert

It was OK. At times it was repetitious but I think I get what the author was striving for. The science was OK but every now and then it lapsed into a false "good for the species" feel for how evolution works, although I think these were mistakes arising from overly "waxing poetic". Another critisism I have is that I think the author could have better expressed the vast expanses of time involved. Someone unfamiliar with geologic time periods could be mislead into thinking that one generation of homonid is continuously morphing into the next.

2020-08-26 08:33