Zenia J J من عند La Falda, Cordoba, الأرجنتين من عند La Falda, Cordoba, الأرجنتين

نحن لسنا مولودين للقراءة. يقوم الدماغ ببعض الأشياء المدهشة من أجل القراءة ، ويتناول هذا الكتاب تلك العملية الخيميائية المذهلة إلى حد ما. ظللت أفكر في مقولة جونغ ، "إن اجتماع شخصيتين يشبه اتصال مادتين كيميائيتين: إذا كان هناك أي تفاعل ، فإن كلاهما قد تحول." القراءة تغير حياتنا ، وحياتنا تتغير القراءة يقول الذئب. - يصعب قراءة فصول عُسر القراءة وهي كثيفة إلى حد ما وفنية.

أحب Burke ، لكنني كنت في نيو أورليانز ، لقد كان أكثر متعة لأنني تذكرت بعض المواقع التي ذكرها. تحتوي أسراره على عدة خطوط قصة تسير في وقت واحد ، والتي تترابط جميعها معًا ، لكن يمكن أن تكون مربكة بعض الشيء في البداية.

كان هذا الكتاب في الغالب غير ملهم ، وغالبا ما يكون غير صحيح. لا يبدو أنه يعتمد على الأبحاث أو الأدلة ، بل مجرد نوع من الشائعات أو التخمينات التي يمكن أن تسمعها من أي شخص. عنوان لطيف ، ولكن عموما ، ما هي مضيعة للوقت.

The best part: the explanation of why meaningful coincidences are, indeed, meaningful - because all our lines of connection come from the same source. Jung also explains why his theory goes beyond the "primitive" idea of assumed belief in the meaningfulness of events (e.g. believing disease occurred because one is being punished, etc.), as well as the Chinese idea in the Tao and the belief in the whole vs. the detail (which is generally what Jung's idea of synchronicity is): it's simply because he's framing it within the realm of western scientific thought. One of the effects of this is his argument that western thought is rooted too much in the idea of "causality," and so "synchronicity" is a kind of western challenge to the idea of causality. I personally would add two thoughts to Jung's discussion: 1) Rather than a globe which has longitudinal lines which begin at the same source (which, it could be said, is God) and latitudinal lines which illustrate events which connect individuals as they go along their individual paths, I think the diagram should be more a bunch of lines starting at one source which all have erratic shapes and whose coincidental "collisions" are represented as specific intersections between the actual lines. 2) I think it's important to think about whether or not it is true that if a whole society thinks more in terms of synchronicity, that it actually becomes more true. For example, I feel that in Asian societies where people collectively believe more in their interconnectedness, one might actually experience more strange coincidences than they would experience in a society that did not think that way. Thus, even the existence of synchronicity is relative to the belief of a group. Similarly, in the US, our beliefs in pushing the individual will and thought over the top has literally proven to birth more innovation.